SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Spansion Inc.
CY 23.820.0%Apr 16 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bobs10 who wrote (3136)1/23/2008 2:02:04 AM
From: NicoV  Read Replies (1) of 4590
 
>Would the 16% of MB production at 65nm include TSMC?
Yes. They said a portion of the 300mm 65nm production would be foundry production, but they didn't say how much.
>Does that indicate that by H208 all 90nm MB will be done at SPSN?
Yes. They were pretty clear that they would try to drive down foundry production as fast as possible.

IMO, foundry is just a way to get enough product if their internal capacity is insufficient, rather than a drive to a fab-lite model. With SP1 becoming productive, there is less need for foundry capacity. If demand is high enough for products that are manufacturable at SP1, they will expand capacity at SP1, because it improves their gross margin (see slide on what kind of cost benefit they get going from 2000 to 4000 to 8000 wafer starts per week at SP1).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext