SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: neolib who wrote (19820)1/27/2008 6:22:39 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 36921
 
Yes most he laws of science detail how various phenomena behave within certain constraints. And many detail exactly what outcomes will occur. Brillant engineers and scientists like myself have come with measurements and techniques of measurement that verify exactly what outcomes will occur within 1 part in an exa,exa,exa part. That is the accuracy that leads to the miracles of modern technology.

And those who know science laws know CO2 has no properties that at current or twice current atmospheric concentration would cause or drive global warming.

that being case, why would any rational person care if the earth is warming or cooling because of whatever non CO2 causes. Other than to prepare for what might be predicted. But the fact that currently their is exa,exa,exa,exa,exa,exa to little data to predict more accurately then flipping a coin what will happen next month, there is little value in planning beyond normal cautions.

The hoax of the fecal brained required some man produced danger to fleece the ignorant.

I personally hope the planet is still warming and will keep warming for centuries.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext