SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Spansion Inc.
CY 23.820.0%Apr 16 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: BUGGI-WO2/6/2008 9:23:08 AM
  Read Replies (1) of 4590
 
OT - DRAM
I have said a few times watch all these guys going into a
nightmare - voila:

001: SEMICON REPORT:DRAM Indus Needs Production Cuts Amid Losses
002: By Yun-Hee Kim
003: Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
004: HONG KONG (Dow Jones)--The latest earnings results from the world's top
005: memory-chip makers attest to how severely companies have been battered by the
006: recent collapse in chip prices.
007: Analysts warn that if chip makers don't slow their capacity expansion plans
008: further or shut down some facilities in the near term, hefty losses will mount,
009: forcing them to burn cash to sustain their operations.
010: Making things worse, chip prices aren't likely to recover soon as
011: manufacturers cope with weak seasonal demand in the first quarter and second
012: quarter. "There's been a general slowdown of production growth but not enough,"
013: said BNP Paribas analyst Peter Yu. "Economically speaking, it doesn't make
014: sense for companies to be producing" at current pricing levels.
015: The average spot price of the mainstream DRAM chip - a 512-megabit double
016: data rate two chip that runs at 667 megahertz - was US$1.07 each late Tuesday
017: on DRAMeXchange, Asia's biggest spot market for chips. The price has fallen
018: nearly 60% in the last six months.
019: Global DRAM revenue fell 19% to $6.5 billion in the fourth quarter from $7.97
020: billion in the third quarter as average selling prices plunged 31%, according
021: to El Segundo, Calif.-based market research firm iSuppli Corp. The decline in
022: market revenue resulted in an industrywide operating loss of nearly $3 billion
023: in the fourth quarter, the researcher said. "There's a lesson to be learned
024: from the fourth-quarter DRAM disaster: in this game of upping the production
025: ante, no supplier wins and the entire industry loses," said Nam Hyung Kim,
026: director and chief analyst at iSuppli. "Most suppliers' expected operating
027: profits for this year won't even support their current capital spending plans."
028: In recent weeks, chip makers from Hynix Semiconductor Inc. (000660.SE) of
029: South Korea to Elpida Memory Inc. (6665.TO) of Japan and Powerchip
030: Semiconductor Corp. (5346.OT) of Taiwan have reported steeper-than-expected
031: losses for the three months ended Dec. 31, and warned of weaker market
032: conditions ahead.
033: After Hynix posted a net loss of KRW465 billion - its biggest quarterly net
034: loss since the fourth quarter of 2003 - Senior Vice President for strategic
035: planning O.C. Kwon said Friday the DRAM industry will remain "challenging" and
036: weak prices may persist. Hynix also proceeded to cut its capital spending
037: budget this year by 25% to KRW3.6 trillion.
038: The company, the world's second-largest DRAM producer by revenue after
039: Samsung Electronics Co. (005930.SE), forecast DRAM shipments globally to rise
040: between 55% and 60% this year and that it would match the market's growth.
041: Powerchip, Taiwan's biggest DRAM maker by revenue, posted a record net loss
042: of NT$14.11 billion in its fourth quarter ended Dec. 31 and warned last week
043: that it expects to continue to post losses in the first quarter. It nearly
044: halved its 2008 capital spending plans to NT$35.1 billion from the NT$63.4
045: billion spent in 2007. But still, Powerchip said while it anticipated slower
046: output growth this year, it wasn't planning any production cuts.
047: Elpida, Japan's sole maker of DRAM chips, said last week its net loss for the
048: three months ended Dec. 31 was Y12.1 billion, much worse than the average
049: forecast of Y2.7 billion predicted by analysts. It also cut its full-year
050: capital spending budget to Y100 billion for the coming fiscal year from Y241
051: billion budgeted for this fiscal year ending March 2008.
052: That came after Samsung, the industry's No. 1 producer, saw profitability
053: from its chip business tumble to its lowest level since the chip industry's
054: downturn of 2001.
055: After posting a steep loss of EUR598 million for its first quarter ended Dec.
056: 31, Germany's Qimonda AG (QI) in late January cut its shipment forecast for
057: this year to 30% to 40%, from 50%. It also said it would accelerate reduction
058: of capacities on older generation 200-millimeter facilities and delay building
059: a new 300-millimeter chip plant in Singapore.
060: The newer generation 300-millimeter facilities can boost chip output by 30%
061: compared with 200-millimeter plants.
062: And in a sign that difficult times are forcing companies to look for ways to
063: survive, U.S. chip maker Micron Technology Inc. (MU) said in December it is
064: looking at partnership opportunities for its DRAM business amid rapid price
065: declines. "The issue of profitability is becoming even more critical in the
066: DRAM market as capital expenditure requirements grow," said iSuppli's Kim.
067: "Unfortunately the DRAM industry is headed for at least two more quarters of
068: major losses."
069: Jim Handy, an analyst at semiconductor market research firm Objective
070: Analysis, said he doesn't expect a full recovery in the DRAM market until 2009.
071: He said it isn't easy for DRAM makers to cut production but companies may
072: need to shut down facilities to survive. "If they idle any of their capacity
073: they still incur that cost, which now must be defrayed over a smaller number of
074: shipped units," said Handy. "The alternative is to shut down their least
075: efficient facilities, which would be their 200 millimeter fabs."
076: At least one chip maker in Asia - Taiwan's ProMOS Technologies Inc. (5387.OT)
077: - recently said it would suspend production following continued losses. ProMOS
078: spokesman Ben Tseng said last month the chip maker would suspend production of
079: DRAM chips at its two 12-inch chip plants in Taichung for around 10 days
080: between late January and early February.
081: The news led to a short rebound in DRAM prices on the spot market in
082: anticipation that industry oversupply would ease, but prices have since tumbled
083: again on weak demand.
084: Objective Analysis's Handy warned that DRAM prices, which are hovering at
085: production costs, haven't hit bottom yet and tough times may continue. "Since
086: prices are low, makers are motivated to reduce costs by shrinking their chips
087: and this will result in added capacity in existing facilities," he said.
088: Table Of Average Weekly Spot Prices
089: Feb 5 Jan 28 Jan 8 Dec 28
090: 32 Gb NAND $12.30 $12.22 $11.77 $12.06
091: 16 Gb NAND $5.81 $5.88 $5.68 $5.92
092: 8 Gb NAND $3.06 $3.07 $3.27 $3.33
093: 4 Gb NAND $2.22 $2.28 $2.67 $3.06
094: 1 Gb DDR2-667 $2.18 $2.21 $1.88 $1.89
095: 512 Mb DDR2-667 $1.07 $1.09 $0.92 $0.92
096: 512 Mb DDR2-533 $1.03 $1.04 $0.90 $0.90
097: Sources - Brokers, module makers, DRAMeXchange
098: -By Yun-Hee Kim, Dow Jones Newswires; 852-2832-2330; yun-hee.kim@dowjones.com
099: TALK BACK: We invite readers to send us comments on this or other financial
100: news topics. Please email us at TalkbackAsia@dowjones.com. Readers should
101: include their full names, work or home addresses and telephone numbers for
102: verification purposes. We reserve the right to edit and publish your comments
103: along with your name; we reserve the right not to publish reader comments.
104: (END) Dow Jones Newswires
105: February 05, 2008 23:08 ET (04:08 GMT)

I hope this serious DRAM/NAND downturn goes on, which will
bode well for SPSN for compet. reasons, just because all
these guys will go away from FAB-exp. plans and they will
probably slow node migrations too.

BUGGI
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext