SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : SYQUEST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Cogito who wrote (4290)10/13/1997 12:12:00 PM
From: Raven McCloud   of 7685
 
Check out this news from 2/97, especially where Howard Rosencrans, Brous & Co analyst, says,
"I don't think that [SyQuest] will reach profitability," said HD
. "They may have one
good product, but they have too much overhead. Some time in
1997, they will cease to exist."

CEASE TO EXIST!! Just proves the fact that analysts have their own self intersts in mine. Thank you Howard!

February 3, 1997, 4:30 p.m. PT

Despite posting a narrower first-quarter loss today, SyQuest
(SYQT) continued to see its sales erode thanks to competitor
Iomega (IOM).

The manufacturer of removable-cartridge hard drives reported a
net loss of $6.8 million, or 86 cents a share, for the quarter
ending December 31, compared with a loss of $33.8 million,
$2.98 per share, for the same quarter a year earlier.

The company reported revenues of $48.3 million for the quarter,
a drop from $78.7 million for the same period last year.

Analysts said the lost revenues were due to decreased sales of the
company's Ezflyer portable storage drive and competition from
Iomega. But, the company said that it is back on track.

"At this point we believe the marketplace has a tremendous
growth opportunity," said SyQuest's president and CEO, Ed
Harper. "SyQuest really created this marketplace. It may have lost
its way for a time, but the growing marketplace has tremendous
opportunity."

Harper said that what the company needs is a change in attitude.

"In the past SyQuest dominated the marketplace that they created
and thus, were not very good at marketing and merchandising
their products. We have revamped the entire department with a
renewed and invigorated approach to marketing and advertising,"
he said.

Analysts, however, doubt that SyQuest's new products will
become a driving force in the industry.

"I don't think that [SyQuest] will reach profitability," said HD
Brous & Co analyst Howard Rosencrans. "They may have one
good product, but they have too much overhead. Some time in
1997, they will cease to exist."

That dismal forecast stands in contrast with positive expectations
for the disk drive industry as a whole.

"It's been a pretty good year for the storage industry," said David
Takata, an analyst with Gruntal & Company in an earlier
interview. "There has been decent demand, but more importantly,
there's been decent pricing stability."

And Iomega, a head-to-head competitor of SyQuest, has seen a
part of that good fortune.

Iomega (IOM) last week announced fourth-quarter profits had
more than doubled and said it plans to slash its domestic work
force by up to 700 jobs as it increased production in Malaysia.

But what is causing the sink-and-swim scenario between
competitors? "Iomega has proved that the vast market is in the
low end," said Rosencrans. "SyQuest's technology is much too
expensive. They can't compete with Zip [drives], and they are no
longer trying."

Despite improved profits, SyQuest's stock hit its 52-week low.
The shares traded as low as 2-5/8, before closing the day at 2-3/4,
up 1/32 of a point. SyQuest's previous 52-week low was
2-23/32.

Company CFO Henry Montgomery said he expects the company
to become profitable sometime this year. SyQuest is now
shipping its SyJet 1.5GB drive in significant volume, and it will
be the company's focus this quarter.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext