SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (25905)2/8/2008 9:05:57 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
Re: "If you say "X has caused more harm than benefit."

AS I EXPLAINED (for what seems like a dozen times or so now... :-) that was the conclusion of OMB, CBO, and Trend Macrolytics, (back when they were asked to model the economics of the tax and budget changes Bush was proposing).

In short... what ALL THREE efforts said was:

1) Lower taxes GOOD. (Increase economic performance of the US economy.) but,

2) Federal Deficits BAD. (Lower economic performance level of the American economy).

What all three projected was that UNLESS FEDERAL SPENDING WAS REDUCED that *all measurable benefits* from the proposed tax changes would be washed out by the counter-trend of harm from continued significant deficit spending. ('Washed-out' by around 'mid decade' or so... which I believe has come to pass.)

Re: "idea that it isn't an opinion...."

$200 Billion federal cost (this fiscal year) for interest on the national debt is not an 'opinion', LOL!

It approximately matches the entire cost this year for the Occupation of Iraq ($190 Billion and counting....)

Next fiscal year, interest expense will quite likely be the much greater expense....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext