SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (25924)2/9/2008 8:40:30 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
AS I EXPLAINED (for what seems like a dozen times or so now... :-) that was the conclusion of OMB, CBO, and Trend Macrolytics

Exactly, as I said you quoted other people. OK technically you didn't quote them you just said they said it, but the point is the same.

1) Lower taxes GOOD. (Increase economic performance of the US economy.) but,

2) Federal Deficits BAD. (Lower economic performance level of the American economy).

So that you are saying (or at least reporting others as saying, and then suggesting the others are likely correct) that the tax cuts have a net bad result because they increase the deficit. I'm not claiming you said, or support the idea, that tax cuts with spending cuts are also bad, but that the tax cuts in the context that they actually happened are bad.

If these three groups said it can you quote and link to their actual statements, rather than just paraphrasing them?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News