SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (114614)2/13/2008 12:43:21 PM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (3) of 173976
 
Highly dubious "evidence". Iraq had a nuclear program for power generation. They never had any facilities for upgrading yellowcake to weapons grade. The IAEA was let in by Saddam and was inspecting their facilities. It's very EASY to monitor any such activity.

The "radioactive" material was spent fuel from the defunct reactors (that were bombed by the Isreali's - highly irresponsible in potentially exposing the Iraqi people to a nuclear disaster). The containers were sealed by the IAEA and the seals were broken by the USA. The US Troops allowed looters into the facilities and much of that material disappeared into thin air.

There's again this myth of a "dirty bomb", which is all nonsense. There's no such possibility of developing any such device that would spread enough nuclear material to harm anyone.

Nice spin though. Try again.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext