SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (20317)2/14/2008 1:33:41 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (2) of 36917
 
Do we know that no divine power has had anything to do with the origin of the universe and life? Yes or no.

No.

Question for you. Can anyone show with even reasonable probability that any divine power had anything to do with the origin of the universe and life? Yes or no?


You don't get it. You made a point that NASA had accepted McIntyre's corrections which then made 1934 the warmest year of the past century. Any graph which shows the 1930's, particularly 1934, as being substantially cooler than later years must be wrong. How does one accept that 1934 was the warmest year of the past century and still put forward graphs showing it as a lot cooler?

Why don't you explain this to me as a test of whether you can figure anything on climate out by yourself? I've already told you why, and you still can't understand it.

Now I see why you thought Wegman did include a graph refuting Mann. You really have no clue what the graphs mean.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News