SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (20327)2/14/2008 2:03:30 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (2) of 36917
 
As a sanity check you might want to apply the fine tuning of the universe argument to the fine tuning of our solar system. The universe is rather full of stars and planets, and not too many of them seem suitable for life, so perhaps it is a numbers game?

A less disagreeable person would just admit they can't answer the question.

LOL. You are a moron. First, it was not a question for me. You were the idiot confusing N. America with global temp. You repeatedly made that mistake. You specifically stated that the 1934 was the warmest year for the earth. Complete nonsense. Then you act injured rather than admitting your mistake.

Guess what, I learned once again that you have no intention of either being honest or accurate, or of learning. You're happy being ignorant, because that allows you to believe what you want to believe.

I keep hoping to find one AGW doubter with some integrity as well as understanding of science. You are not it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext