SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 214.18-0.5%Dec 31 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (247819)2/14/2008 4:14:12 PM
From: wbmwRead Replies (3) of 275872
 
Re: The PIII had 12 stages in order and 2 out of order.

Better tell Intel to update their slides. They claimed 10 stages in their comparison foils with Pentium 4.

anandtech.com

The K7 had a 10 stage integer and 15 stage floating point pipeline. This was the best diagram I could find to illustrate it:

cs.utah.edu

So they each had an integer pipeline depth of 10, but that does not invalidate my point. Intel designed the P6 pipeline in 1995 for their 0.6u process. Many things change between that and the 0.18u Pentium III, and a repipelining might have certainly contributed to enabling higher clock frequencies, even while keeping the number of critical stages the same.

Many claimed that AMD designed the K7 core for their 0.18u process, even though they initially launched it at 0.25u. But unarguably, it had a better balanced pipeline for driving to higher frequencies.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext