GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: American Spirit who wrote (114656)	2/14/2008 4:40:29 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) of 173976

Not since the early 90's or earlier than that, which means it's irrelevant for 2003 Clinton believed Iraq had WMD 13:59 AEDT Fri 9 Jan 2004 AFP - Former US president Bill Clinton said in October during a visit to Portugal that he was convinced Iraq had weapons of mass destruction up until the fall of Saddam Hussein, Portuguese Prime Minister Jose Manuel Durao Barroso said. "When Clinton was here recently he told me he was absolutely convinced, given his years in the White House and the access to privileged information which he had, that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction until the end of the Saddam regime," he said in an interview with Portuguese cable news channel SIC Noticias. papillonsartpalace.com "When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and chemical material unaccounted for. That is, at the end of the first Gulf War, we knew what he had. We knew what was destroyed in all the inspection processes and that was a lot. And then we bombed with the British for four days in 1998. We might have gotten it all; we might have gotten half of it; we might have gotten none of it. But we didn't know. So I thought it was prudent for the president to go to the U.N. and for the U.N. to say you got to let these inspectors in, and this time if you don't cooperate the penalty could be regime change, not just continued sanctions." --Bill Clinton, July 22, 2003 weeklystandard.com snopes.com freedomagenda.com hillaryproject.com theanchoressonline.com motherjones.com Read 'em, boy. Every word. Then explain to me why it was OK for Clinton and his boys and girls to believe all through his Presidency (not just the early '90s, as you lyingly state)that Saddam had WMD and represented a threat and should be removed (what ELSE could 'regime change' possibly mean in the case of a ruthless dictator?) but not OK for his successor to believe the same when nothing had changed? Come on. DO IT. I want to hear this. I see you and call you. And know you are congenitally incapable of anything remotely resembling a logical argument. Answer or you go back into your ignore cell- -and stay there! Put up or shut up.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next