SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DavesM who wrote (20593)2/22/2008 11:43:55 AM
From: neolib  Read Replies (2) of 36918
 
IIRC, tools have been dated back to 2+Mya, and braincases were up to 1 liter around 1 Mya, by which point tool use was prevalent, but fire use was tentative. By the time fire use was prevalent, I don't think brain size has changed more than 10%. So the big expansion of brain size was in the time of early tool use, not fire use.

Many people have pet theories as to what drove human evolution, but I doubt it was any single cultural advancement. Language is an example of one that many people also push as being "the" cause of human evolution. I suspect they are all important, but there was no "the" cause, although specific genetic events might eventually be identified as being quite significant. The problem with tools, fire, language, etc, is that quite a few different species all had them, but only we remain. So at best, you could try to claim we had them in better degree than the others.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext