Sten & Breen
by Anthony Elgindy
Greetings to all,
RE: UPDATE / APPEAL
Just thought I’d pop in and say hello and stuff. First off, I wanted to let everyone know that the Oral Arguments on my appeal have been moved again & as soon as I get the new date I will post it here.(hopefully in March).Secondly I wanted to share something else, something that I think will, perhaps, be of great interest to folks in general but of much greater concern to certain individuals and their co-conspirators...especially as this case relates to the events of 9/11...
Everyone now knows that in this case, immediately after my arrest, back in May of 2002, a NY prosecutor named Kenneth Breen flew across the country and appeared in court in San Diego, at my bail hearing, to object against my application for bail. At this hearing he stood there and without a scintilla of evidence, stated in open court that I knew about "9/11 before it happened and instead of reporting it, I tried to profit from it".. Allegations that were not true, and allegations that he knew, at that very time, weren't true. BREEN said this because he knew it would instantly transform me from who I was and how I was seen in the market into something that I was not instantly, as a result, my bail was denied.
It took me another 4 months to finally get bail but Breen's remarks took on a life of their own and then engulfed every aspect of this case and it continues to this very day..........
Although everyone in the govt knew back then as they do now that his comments were TOTALLY bogus and that no such connection or link ever existed it NEVER mattered..BREEN was steadfastly committed to his bullshit and he was committed to turning me into a "terrorist" even though he knew it was all a lie. A lie that he himself created out of thin air.
Unfortunately, this bullshit not only prejudiced my trial but it also destroyed any chance I ever had to get a fair trial, either in the courtroom or in the public.. The non-stop barrage of totally unfounded and false incendiary and prejudicial "9/11" and "terrorism" tainted allegations that were made repeatedly in public and throughout the trial caused two attempts on my life, once during the trial itself and the second time the night before I was scheduled to be transferred back to California from NY's MCC.
[You can see a detailed presentation of much of this evidence laid out in both of my appellate briefs, currently pending in the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals]
During the trial I was attacked by a 300 lb. brainless thug, named Ronny Petrino who believed that I was a "rich terrorist" attacked me on Jan 1, 2005 with steal padlocks tied to a sock....The second attack occurred in October 2006 by another inmate who used a metal pipe on the last night I was in the general population in NY's MCC...
To demonstrate just one example of lies and criminal intent to prejudice everyone , including the court itself, against me, here is a little side-bar from the trial in which BREEN, the Lead prosecutor in my case along with former SEC attorney, John Sten fabricate a lie and a story about me, just before Sten is called to testify and is put on the stand. Jon Sten was the SEC attorney that I worked with to help the SEC figure out what kind of scam broker, Mike Zaman and former AUSA Drew Pitt were perpetrating on the public in an obscure little stock called Conectysis...The very same stock promotion that caused Zaman to threaten to kill me....The SEC even made those allegations formally at the time......
Here BREEN, in a private and later "sealed" side-bar tells the Court and judge that former SEC attorney, John Sten had investigated my shorting and trading activity after the 1st WTC b0mbing, which occurred in February of 1993.. As you will see the reaction is strong from the judge..................however there is a problem with all of this, but first you should read what occurred, first;;
[12-16-04 TRIAL TRANSCRIPT]
5912
1 (Sidebar.)
2 MR. BREEN: I was just talking to Mr. Sten in
3 the hallway and something that came up.
4 THE COURT: Mr. Who?
5 MR. BREEN: Mr. Sten.
6 MR. BERKE: You know we are calling in Bressman,
7 he flew in from Washington. We have to get to Bressman.
8 We didn't know if he was coming or not.
9 THE COURT: The out-of-town guy goes first.
10 Bressman.
11 MR. BERKE: He it here now.
12 THE COURT: Do them both.
13 MR. BREEN: Mr. Sten brought something up that
14 he hasn't mentioned before and I thought that he should
15 and I bring it up to warn everyone and I told Mr. Sten to
16 not say what he told me under any circumstances, but
17 apparently, as part of an investigation he worked on,
18 there was some accusations that a short selling group that
19 included Mr. Elgindy might have actually known about and
20 traded ahead of the first bombing of the World Trade
21 Center. I told him not to mention it.
22 MR. GERZOG: The '93?
23 MR. BREEN: The date, that's what he told me.
24 He knows not to go into it. I wanted everybody to know
25 that that he wouldn't go near it. I told him not to
Anthony Frisolone, CRR
Official US District Court Reporter
5913
1 answer any question, just stop to turn to you, Your Honor,
2 but this is --
3 THE COURT: Fake a heart attack.
4 MR. BREEN: I'll take a heart attack.
5 THE COURT: If he says it, I'll have a heart
6 attack so, okay.
7 MR. BERKE: We'll all get to enjoy our holidays.
8 My joke was --
9 MR. GERZOG: Scrambling to explain.
10 MR. BERKE: Stop. My joke was that there would
11 have to be a mistrial and the trial would end.
12 THE COURT: Is that to clarify?
13 MR. BERKE: That is what I meant. I'm not that
14 quick.
15 MR. LEVINE: February 12th.
16 MR. BERKE: I ask that everything we discuss be
17 under seal.
18 THE COURT: That's very interesting. But, yes,
19 of course.
Its pretty interesting stuff isn’t it ?? Pretty incredible,, in fact....Here is BREEN doing it once again, not only did he manage to link me to the tragedy of the WTC attacks of 9/11/2001....here he is telling the judge that I was also investigated for the same type of thing during the very 1st attacks on the WTC, 8 years earlier, in February of 1993 !!!
Here we have John Sten and ken Breen linking me to the first b0mbing in 1993 of the WTC, in a side-bar which was promptly sealed and NEVER disclosed to me or anyone in the public ever before...
There is just one problem with all of this, It is all a lie. In fact nothing that Breen said or that John Sten claimed could have possibly been true.........In February of 1993 I was a retail stock broker peddling penny stocks to the public at the now defunct firm that was known as Armstrong McKinley.....then in June of 1993 until Dec of 2004 I was on disability, never working as a trader, much less a "short-seller".
In Fact, My first short sale of my entire life occurred in October 1995, after Key West Securities was cleared for trading.. My 1st short sale of my entire life happened 2 1/2 years after the 1993 b0mbing of the WTC........
Breen and Sten lied again.. |
