Sedex (V.SDN) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Sedex (V.SDN)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: wayne nikituk who wrote (31)	10/13/1997 8:41:00 PM
From: Big Shorty	of 87

Wayne, Hughes has a way to go yet before he has a deposit near Kimberley. Kennecott's hole K-97-03 appears to be 45 kms due N and trending across stratigraphy. Zn-Pb-As?? Since when did the Sullivan Mine have Arsenides in the ore?? Note the intersection between 505.90m and 506.55m at 33.7%Zn, 9.51% Pb and 80.9g/t Ag. Not a typical "SEDEX" deposit profile here, and we're not talking Sedex as in the company's name. Kennecott calls the sulphides "veins" and NOT "beds". Those ratios that Dr. Woodfill points out don't appeart consistent to me. They refer to pyrrhotite and sphalerite stringers but no assay confirmation given for this claim. I look at Abitibi and Sedex'x map Figure 1 and of course the economic feature is to find the corridor in the Lower Aldridge Formation as at the Sullivan Mine. I Note that NOWHERE ELSE on the entire map is a similar feature shown. On their figure 2, I am curious why DDH K-97-03 was drilled where it is and not down the Panda Vent System (i.e. 700 meters to the SW?). Also on Figure 2 DDH K-97-03 is shown at about 85 degrees but apparently was drilled at 45 deg. Why is this displayed as such?? I'd like to see a few of these key points explained?? Your comments please? Jim Cox

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next