SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 442.03-2.6%4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (30098)2/28/2008 11:10:14 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (2) of 220045
 
CB, surely you tell your clients to discuss just what deal the mortgagees would accept.

Somebody will own the houses. In many cases, it might as well be the people who live there now. It would save the transaction costs, loss of income during the time the house is empty and the existing owners might be willing to stay there if there's enough incentive.

I suppose in many instances the people currently occupying the houses can't afford even the devalued price so lots should forfeit the house. But I guess maybe half of them could be the right people to live in the houses.

But maybe it's better to walk across the street and buy each other's houses at half price at mortgagee auctions using 100% loans from new lenders.

It's all very interesting.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext