SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bentway who wrote (372522)3/2/2008 6:50:02 AM
From: Taro  Read Replies (1) of 1577148
 
Chris,

I am no supporter of the ID theory per se.

I just pointed out the facts around the Cambrian Explosion and why in particular the CE got that name.

This is old and was well known to Charles Darwin as well.

Considering all the big bucks invested since then by science to prove that those missing higher life forms found were indeed present even prior to the CE, it is truly amazing that those efforts and bucks have but all come in futile and found nothing new.

Nothing has been found and in lieu of that pure speculation has been taking over. That is where scientists cross the borders into the land of believing only. Believing in how it should look, looking for a theory to believe in, a theory which would give them comfort while making the ID and other contenders for the final truth look the most stupid.

Personally I believe it's extremely naive to believe in any one single theory to explain how life came to and developed on Earth.

Taro
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News