SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : V.LTH
LTH 27.39-3.7%Jan 12 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joey Two-Cents who wrote (658)3/3/2008 5:26:42 PM
From: molywantacracker  Read Replies (1) of 874
 
I came across something, but not entirely sure how accurate it is (yes, that is a cautioning qualifier). Essentially, it is the size of historical resource using a lower cut-off. What I found was:

5,600,000 tonnes of 6.1% zinc oxide or 752,886,400 pounds
11,700,000 tonnes of 6.2% zinc sulphide or 1,598,781,600 pounds
17,300,000 tonnes of 0.28% copper or 106,761,760 pounds
17,300,000 tonnes of 14.1g/t of silver or 8,619,435 ounces

Now, ignoring economics, the in-situ value is roughly $3.6 billion.

At 6.1% zinc and using the copper and silver credits, the rock value per tonne at today's prices is about $205/tonne.

Now, once again, I am not exactly sure how accurate this info is, but it does seem reasonable.

I guess my point is that a strong zinc price is so crucial, and the cut-off grade (which is impacted by price) on the 43-101 is likely to have a huge impact as well.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext