I apologize......it is a correct use of the term...... Here is an example I found, the term is used 3 times below........ggg.
"Right Wing has Cranial Rectal Inversion Syndrome
by 7November
Sat Dec 09, 2006 at 10:26:19 PM PDT
A week or so ago a diarist posted a link to Yahoo's frontpage which had a link to a website called nancypelosistinks.com.
Apparently they had bought an Ad on Yahoo that would cost them a dollar for every time someone clicked on the link. I followed directions, and clicked on it for about 20 minutes while I was watching something like the Newshour. I don't know if it cost them a dollar or not. But it did seem to cause them some concern.....
Today I checked my yahoo mail address connected with this profile.
Look what I got in the mail!!! Whoopee
* 7November's diary :: ::
*
I have always believed that, at core, reactionary conservatism of the sort one finds amongst the sterotypical freeper, has, at core, mental deficiency. I am now even more convinced of this. I think "Randy" needs to see his doctor and check to see if he is a victim of Cranial Rectal Inversion Syndrome.
Someone associated with "http://nancypelosistinks.com/index.html" decided to share some love with me. Here is the email I got from "Randy." At the end "Randy" copied in my post here on Dkos. I didn't change any of his spelling or linguistics to make him look like he needs remedial English, it's just the way I got it.
I have copied and paste below the response you posted on Monday in regards to clicking on the Nancy Pelosi web ads on Yahoo.
Do you have a problem with free speech? Nothing on this web page is untrue and this leads me to the question as to why you would
click your mouse for 20 minutes trying to run up the clicks on this paid ad. All the page contains is a collection of news articles on Pelosi
and some of her actions.
It does amaze me how there are thousands of "Bush Bashing" web sites out there and that is all fine under free speech. Many of them
are full of lies, but you don't see me trying to shut them down.
I don't know if you have any morals, but if you do I would say based on Your actions that "Not stealing;" is not one of them.
Oh yea, why were you "rotflmao?" Was it because you commited "Click Fraud?"
Respectfully,
Randy
I clicked it for 20 minutes!! (0 / 0)
I have cable, very fast.
I am watching the News Hour with Jim Lehrer, here on the left coast its almost 4pm.
I just put my mouse there, clicked to the link, right clicked back, and then clicked on the link.
Just kept my mouse in one place, watched the news, and clicked for 20 minutes.
rotflmao
thanks!
So "Nothing on this web page is untrue" Lets put this claim to the test, shall we "Randy?"
From the articles linked to the site that my new friend refers to as factual......
Factual Allegation number one:
In 1994, TV news made much of the alleged extremism of GOP candidates and the "rage" of future Speaker Newt Gingrich. Nancy Pelosi is an unabashed, hardcore liberal, and her rhetoric is as negative and "angry" as any member of the Class of ‘94. The difference in 2006 is that the networks show no interest in the extremism and nastiness of the liberals who want to control Congress.
This claim is completely undocumented, and when you make a factual claim you have a burden to back up your assertion.
Factual allegation number two:
For thoughts on Iraq from people who know what they’re talking about, check out the new Instacast on Rumsfeld with Austin Bay and Jim Dunnigan. There’s a fascinating split of opinion between them: Bay believes Rummy was in over his head from 9/11 onward but Dunnigan thinks no SecDef could have done better given the peculiarities, shall we say, of Arab culture.
No Secretary of Defense could have done better? Really? (Trivial aside, I used to play Strategy and Tactics simulations from Mr. Dunnigan back in the early 70's.)
Factual allegation number three:" |
