SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Silver prices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: calgarylady3/11/2008 8:29:10 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 8010
 
Is Silver the Sleeper?

David Morgan
07 March 2008 @ 04:27 pm EST

Last week in my first column for The International Business Times, I addressed the theoretical price of gold in U.S. dollar terms. This is a straightforward calculation based upon the M1 currency supply and the amount of gold the Treasury of the United States claims it owns.

Naturally, putting your neck out for a gold price leads to the next logical question and that is, "What price will silver reach at its high point?" This question is much more difficult to answer, because silver is not considered to be money in any governments monetary base, either officially or unofficially.

Let me digress here for a moment. Many central banks worldwide still own gold. Yes, most have sold gold for paper the past several years, but they do consider it to be a monetary asset nonetheless. Additionally, some governments are actually increasing their gold holdings, so it is factually correct to place gold into the monetary aggregate base.

This is not true of silver; both the Chinese and Indian governments hold pitifully small amounts of silver in inventory, but for all practical purposes, all governmental silver holdings are depleted. Yet silver has been used as money more often, in more places, and for longer periods of time than even gold. This is difficult for most Western readers to absorb, yet as Milton Friedman said in 1993,

"The major monetary metal in history is silver, not gold."

Coming back to forecasting the price of silver, we need to define a methodology. One way is to use what I call the classic, or monetary, ratio. This is based upon a bimetallic standard, which was exercised when both gold and silver were used daily as money. The ratio was fixed between 15-16 to 1. In other words, one ounce of gold bought 16 ounces of silver. If we use our gold price of $2900 derived in last week's column, and divide by 16, that puts silver at $181.25 per ounce.

Is this possible? Under our current financial conditions I am reluctant to rule out anything, but I am also a practical investor. Before we ever get to even $100, which I have forecast as a price I do expect silver to achieve, we must move above $30, then $40, and take out the old nominal high of $50. I think you see my point, and the ultimate high price is impossible to determine, because only the market knows. But in my view, silver has way too many things going for it not to continue higher over the next several years.

Consider the following points:

Silver has every monetary attribute of gold and is far more affordable to the general public

Monetary worry was primarily U.S.-based in 1980; today it is a worldwide concern

The U.S. was in far stronger financial condition in 1980 than today

The Silver etf did not exist in 1980

ibtimes.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext