SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Agouron Pharmaceuticals (AGPH)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: biodoc who wrote (2310)10/14/1997 11:30:00 AM
From: Joe E.   of 6136
 
Re your <<What was the patient population in the 141W94 + 3TC + AZT trial? Were these early patients naive to therapy, or had they been pre-treated with AZT or AZT + 3TC?>>

Basically, as I read the press releases, these patients have been pretreated with either AZT or AZT+3TC. IMO this makes the results not so bad. Also, the results are of course for all three doses tried. One of the purposes of the trial was to get the dosage correct, so it is entirely possible that the lower doses were worse than the higher doses. This was not mentioned in the press report.

Also, the press report did not differentiate between viral loads, amount of pretreatment, and did not mention the severity of the side effects, so there is much that is not known.

Still... I think the Vertex crowd was hoping for something better, and that if there was a dose that delivered a 100% knockout, it would have been mentioned in the press release, unless they are really conservative over there. I don't think that the Vertex drug can be dismissed yet, but I agree with John W. that it is looking less formidable than the whispers about it would have indicated.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext