Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mph who wrote (241726)	3/13/2008 5:34:23 AM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (3) of 794157

I agree all laws should be enforced. I agree selective enforcement cannot be tolerated. I agree there is more than prostitution involved in this case. I am not suggesting any laws be ignored. The piece of the discussion I was addressing was about sex between consenting adults and I do question the appropriateness of the federal government managing sex between consenting adults with criminal laws. Favors for sex or as an inducement for sex between consenting adults is hardly a new human concept. Why make it unlawful? Could or would the prostitution part of this case have been made in the areas of Nevada where it is legal? I know there are religious views at stake here too. But in America I don't believe religious views are not supposed to become the basis for government control of natural human behavior.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next