THE WHITE HOUSE Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE

SPY 684.83

+0.6%

Dec 22 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (18266)	3/13/2008 12:05:12 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) of 25737

Nor is it surprising that the left uses an old and irrelevant comparison — between the cost of keeping a criminal behind bars versus the cost of higher education. According to the Times, "Vermont, Connecticut, Delaware, Michigan, and Oregon devote as much or more to corrections as they do to higher education." The relevant comparison would be between the cost of keeping a criminal behind bars and the cost of letting him loose in society. But neither the New York Times nor others on the left show any interest in that comparison. In Britain, the total cost of the prison system per year was found to be 1.9 billion pounds sterling (more than $3.8 billion), while the financial cost alone of the crimes committed per year by criminals was estimated at 60 billion pounds sterling. The big difference between the two kinds of costs is not just in their amounts. The cost of locking up criminals must be paid out of government budgets that politicians would prefer to spend on giveaway programs likelier to get them re-elected. But the far higher costs of letting criminals loose is paid by the general public in both money and in being subjected to violence. washingtontimes.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next