Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 159.89

-0.9%

2:39 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Eric L who wrote (75462)	3/13/2008 5:37:30 PM
From: ggamer	Read Replies (1) of 197235

<Nokia's Fully Paid Up License for Early QUALCOMM CDMA Patents> Good detailed response. So now it makes a lot of sense to me why 3G implementation was delayed until 2007. The world had to wait because Nokia did not want to pay royalty to QCOM. However, looking at the big picture, if Nokia ends up using one of QCOM's patents that is not paid up, then QCOM should be able to charge 6% royalty just like BRCM has been able to charge for a couple of their stupid patents. Otherwise they are more than welcome to work on some workarounds. Do you agree? Do we need a Mr. Lee type of a lawyer to join the QCOM legal team to get it done?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next