SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (112121)3/13/2008 8:50:13 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
If everyone had Model Ts and than everyone get's their choice of a modern car. There has been an increase in well being.

If people don't pay any extra dollars for the cars, they are still in effect wealthier. In fact they are more clearly wealthier having a nice modern car for the same price as the Model T, than they are having to pay a lot extra for it.

No quantifying that degree of increase in their well being is hard. And I'm certainly open to the argument that the offical adjustments make too much of it. But obviously having much better things is an improvement.

what monetary value is generated by a quality improvement if nobody is willing to pay more for the improvement?

People may very well be willing to pay more, but if we can produce better things for the same cost or less, and if there is sufficient competition they won't be paying more even if they might be willing to do so if they had to.

should we all base it off tim's opinion of the dollar value people should pay, but won't?

Should we base if all off Skeeter Bug's opinion that having nicer and more stuff all around is worthless if we don't have to pay more money for these things?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext