SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (374493)3/18/2008 5:20:34 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1577252
 
No, the best economic/financial measurement would be the cost of the energy not the unit of energy.

That wouldn't be economic or financial measurement of energy efficiency. That would be economic measure of how much energy costs. Higher prices don't imply lower efficiency, in fact they tend to cause an increase in efficiency as it becomes worth it to spend more money on the effort to reduce the use of the increasingly expensive commodity.

If your defining "cost of energy per unit", or "total cost for all energy used", as "energy efficiency", well then you have pretty non-standard, even bizarre definitions. Such a definition would not only be different than the standard one, it would be one that has just about no support from anyone else. It isn't a "minority definition", its more like a "Humpty Dumpty" definition, where words mean whatever you say they mean.
sundials.org

And there isn't even any point in such a bizarre definition, its not like terms for those ideas don't exist, so you have to misuse a term for something else.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext