SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
QCOM 159.42-1.2%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stock Farmer who wrote (75583)3/19/2008 8:30:14 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) of 197250
 
It is at times like these that I wish I had taken the Civil Law curriculum at Tulane instead of the common law courses. Don't ask me how I passed the La. bar exam. vbg

Anyway, the following precis [I did learn a little], suggests that injunctions are indeed available to IP owners under French law. However, things are undoubtedly more complex than this blurb sets them out to be as NOK claims it has, I guess, an implicit license. Incidentally, I wonder why they didn't make the same argument when Nokia got the 2001 license. All they had to do was not pay and wait for the 'negotiations' to drag out until eternity was over without infringing.

The blurb:

It is possible to obtain an interim injunction to stop infringing acts. An interim injunction is an order requiring the infringer not to engage in certain actions.

For patents, designs and copyright, an interim injunction may be granted by the president of the court in all urgent cases if no serious objection is raised. Even where confronted with serious objections, the president may, at any time, order interim injuction measures.

A specific interim injunction is available for trademark infringement. The trademark owner can ask the court to stop the infringing acts subject to the requirement that the action before the court be lodged soon after the claimant becomes aware of the infringement. Usually, the French courts consider that a maximum of six months’ delay is acceptable when requesting an injunction. A decision on the merits can be rendered quickly. Therefore, it is recommended that the claimant file an action within the six-month deadline.


More at buildingipvalue.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext