Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 159.42

-1.2%

Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Stock Farmer who wrote (75602)	3/20/2008 8:41:52 AM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (3) of 197253

Nokia is striking at the heart of Q's business model, but is also making an argument which is potentially very dangerous as the price per patent could easily result in a total license/royalty burden which is higher than the one under the 2001 deal. We'll see. I wonder if Q's response is in the public record? I'd like very much to see it. From a purely intuitive standpoint, I think a judge trained in the common law will have some difficulty accepting the arguments NOK makes. They have an air of the surreal, a lack of commercial pragmatism and a seeming attempt to stealthily avoid its obligations which the judge may find offensive, i.e., the $80 million set aside is a joke. But that is my litigator's training at work using Rule No. 1 of litigation: Know Your Judge And Don't Piss Him Off.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next