SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Satellite Radio & Competing Technologies
SIRI 21.69-6.5%Oct 31 9:30 AM EDT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (161)3/27/2008 4:08:37 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 180
 
If You Can’t Beat ‘Em, Regulate the Hell Out of ‘Em
Tuesday, March 25th, 2008

Now that the Justice Department has handed defeat to the National Association of Broadcaster’s high-profile (but laughable) campaign against the XM-Sirius satellite radio merger, they’re taking a new tack: regulate away satellite’s advantages.

Clear Channel is asking the FCC to slap a series of regulations on satellite radio before approving the merger, including requiring XM-Sirius to abide by FCC decency regulations, banning any local broadcasting or advertising (both companies currently offer traffic and weather for large metropolitan areas), minimum public interest programming requirements, and—somewhat surprisingly—licensure for a competing satellite provider.

I actually agree with the last one. I’ve never understood why the federal government only allowed for two satellite radio providers in the first place.

The other requirements are ridiculous. Whatever you think of FCC decency regulations, satellite radio is a subscription service. Customers pay for what they’re getting. You can also easily block objectionable material. As for barring local programming, I’m intrigued to see how Clear Channel plans to argue that limiting competition to terrestrial radio’s local coverage would in any way benefit consumers.

theagitator.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext