SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Madharry who wrote (30449)3/28/2008 4:34:15 AM
From: Paul Senior  Read Replies (1) of 78752
 
OT: "Why you would think that people are morally obligated to take a hundred thousand dollar plus hit to their net worth when they don't legally have to is incomprehensible to me."

-----------------------------------
I don't know if it's that people are morally obligated, ethically obligated, or legally obligated. The hit is already there though. I expect them to take it and move forward with their lives.

For me, I don't care whether their net worth takes a hit or not --- we all are taking a hit to our net worth at this time. If there's a 100k hit---- you take it. It is this: YOU WILL STICK TO YOUR COMMITMENTS. Regardless that the banks won't, or are crooks, or that others are caving.

I have wrestled with this issue almost daily for more than eight years, back when. Discussions with wife, accountant, banks, hangers on, men.

Everyone in such a predicament has to make a decision. I made mine (with the tough and staunch support of my my wife and accountant): If you can pay you pay. Walking is not an option and not the answer.
----------------------
Madharry, you seem to be saying there's no legal reason to have to take a hit, so don't. Walking away is okay.
I didn't at my time, and I am hoping others won't now at their time.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext