SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: LindyBill3/28/2008 2:00:40 PM
  Read Replies (2) of 794146
 
Stop-Loss B.O. Prospects Dim… And So's THR's Analysis
By Dirty Harry

The Hollywood Reporter doesn't quite get it right – because it doesn't quite want to:

"Paramount's Iraq War drama "Stop-Loss" will play in fewer than half as many venues as "21? and "Superhero" as prospects for the film appear grim. …

Amid such low expectations, a debut of $4 million or more would be cause for joy at Paramount. Executives have done extensive research among prospective moviegoers about their attitude toward war films and subsequently are reining in even best-case scenarios accordingly. …

Simply put, the American public has gotten no more interested in the Iraq War during the past year. So it's no more likely to support this movie about the military mission than any of the other previous boxoffice flops on the subject."

What I think The Hollywood Reporter meant to say was that the American public has gotten no more interested in seeing our country and troops defamed by a bunch of ungrateful, multi-millionaires.

The single film about the War on Terror that can be called a hit, albeit a moderate one, is a pro-American actioner called Vantage Point that portrays our President and country in a positive light, and the enemy for who they really are. In all the talk about all the flops no one wants to talk about the one outlier in the equation. Hmm…? Wonder why?

libertyfilmfestival.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext