Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (260764)	4/5/2008 7:43:44 AM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (1) of 281500

That article required some extreme "objective" editing, didn't it, Nadine? I don't even think it's particularly "intellectually honest" to claim the "prompting" thing, since I highly doubt any of the "global warming stopped in 1998" crowd admitted to any possibility of global warming in the 1998 time frame either. Couple Charts and Graphs: en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org If you look at the second one, it appears that every year after 1995 is warmer than 1995 and every year before. E.g. the last 10 years on that graph are the warmest 10 years on record. Claiming that the 1998 spike means global warming has stopped is good conservative "science", no doubt, but pretty dubious reasoning outside the "facts and logic" regime that rules in LindyBill's Church of W.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next