SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Amati investors
AMTX 1.600-1.8%Jan 9 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bill c. who wrote (27084)10/14/1997 11:58:00 PM
From: SteveG   of 31386
 
<Both will be deployed>

Agreed. (As you know, this was not the point of my posts)

<we need the cable fellows to push the RBOC's into action.>

What we REALLY need are compelling reasons (ie., killer apps) to drive the customers and PUSH deployment. In my opinion, where there are cable modems, ADSL will not win - so cable deployment will create only a secondary ADSL/bandwidth market momentum.

<If 100 houses want two-way cable modems, all 500 houses must be upgraded to HFC. The Telco's can provide ADSL to those 100 houses and leave the other 400 alone.>

First, cable companies will upgrade to HFC to carry more premium cable TV services, and are already doing this.

Second, again, MY point was that where there *already* are cable modems, ADSL will not have much penetration. As the cables buildout HFC (and upgrade to 2-way cable CO equipment), this competition will more seriously threaten ADSL - both of which are likely a few years out.

<The Bell Atlantic deal with DSC/Westell is in the $500-$600 per LINE range>

This is only the *equipment* cost. This is nowhere near the real telco cost of technical manhours.

<I didn't know the cable modem was that expensive, $350-$400. I'm guessing it going to cost about $500-$1000/per-paying-customer to upgrade that 500 house neighborhood to HFC.>

The modem cost can be payed by customer upfront, or payed off through renting over 2 years (at the $45/month rate). And as has been noted, cable does not have the costs of maintaining DSLAMs with thousands of CO ADSL units for heat/power/space/surge/crosstalk problems, or field problems like taps/coils and old copper.

<what is the cost difference between installing an HFC system and the Telco's installing fiber into an ONU for a VDSL solution?>

Since cable will get cable TV income from more premium channels that HFC will enable, this is hard to gauge. Depending on VDSL equipment costs and just considering equipment alone, I would guess VDSL is more costly. When you factor in technician maintenance costs, it would seem to be much higher for VDSL.

Steve
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext