SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tyc:> who wrote (58206)4/6/2008 6:14:17 PM
From: onepath  Read Replies (2) of 78408
 
Glad you jumped in here because I like and use your method of figuring out the intrinsic value of the WT. based on a doubling of the share price.

But it is only one piece of the overall picture and every picture is different.If we are talking a doubling of share price over 2 years which is reasonable with your model(I would not buy any resource stock that I could not potentially see a double over 1 year) then what is the value of the warrant after 2 years and that double of the common?

Intrinsic value is nil but the WT. is now just about to start being in the money with better than 7 years time left and now a lot better quality WT.(much larger less risky co.)Running a few models a fair price would be somewhere between a low of $5 and high of $7.50.

So based on a double of NGD over 2 years.
the WT. holder will be up between 3x to 4x compared to the common holders 2x.

The quality of this potential merger is the key.A 10 year WT. on a mining co. with no growth upside would be a pass but so would be the common.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext