SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: SARMAN who wrote (260907)4/7/2008 7:16:15 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
Cheap products? Yes.

Loss of manufacturing jobs? Not really certain. Most of the loss in manufacturing jobs in the US is do to increased productivity. Certainly some things are manufactured in China that used to be manufactured in the US, but 1 - If China didn't manufacture them that doesn't mean they would still be manufactured in the US, they could be manufactured in some third country, and 2 - The positive effects of trade on the economy can create some manufacturing jobs. Still if I had to give a specific answer rather than "not certain", my guess would be that at the margin there are less total manufacturing jobs in the US than there would be if there was no trade with China. OTOH that means that the labor for those jobs can be used for other purposes. We don't have high unemployment. The efficiencies in labor productivity from trade are beneficial not harmful.

reduction of standard of living? - No. An increase in the standard of living.

As for China - holding the US debt/balls - Not really. They can harm us, but only by harming themselves even more.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext