SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (260993)4/8/2008 4:27:25 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 

Except there is no reason to think that there is net job loss because of trade.

You are incorrect. What you meant was that you don't accept any data as likely being supportive of such a position. There is in fact such data, but you will attribute it to other causes, all based on hand waving. Unfortunately, as I keep pointing out to you, this is the modus operandi of economics.

If there were as good of data supporting solar cycles as being responsible for global warming as there is data supporting poorer USA employment due to free trade, AGW would be dead. Just as an example because, IIRC, I think you actually latch on to such weak data in AGW, but seem dead set against even stronger data when it goes against your other ideologies in economics.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News