SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (377191)4/9/2008 1:17:51 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1583270
 
It is also my belief that universal health care will provide only two benefits (in a liberal context):

Yes, I think you're right -- but there are far better ways of reducing the number of uninsured -- which really isn't that many to begin with.

One of the things they do in this argument about the uninsured is to sort of leave off a lot of the facts. Of the 40M or so who are "uninsured", it turns out a good number of them (maybe 15-20%) are provided for by state Medicaid programs, which provides damned decent coverage for them. Here, Huckabee created a program called ARKIDS First which gives children extensive coverage -- including well-child visits and extensive screening. But they consider these people as "uninsured".

Another huge category of uninsured are those who could have insurance but choose not to because they're young, healthy and they just don't want to spend the money. The true number of "uninsured" (as in, "can't afford it") is relatively small -- probably less than 10% of the population, which could be pretty easily accommodated with commercial insurance.

They're going to destroy the best healthcare system in the world if they are allowed to get their hands on it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext