Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Brumar89 who wrote (377356)	4/9/2008 10:20:07 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) of 1577225

I would find it very hard to believe that evidence as critical as the evidence you keep posting would be held back from the judge. If it were true, and the evidence was not admissable in court, then there is some reason its tainted and not admissable. The full content was not made public" does not mean that the judge did not see it. I think it does. Do judges consider evidence the defense can't see? How fair would that be? Furthermore, the judge's ruling was in 2005, wasn't it? The infornation in the World Politics Review article came out in summary form only in 2007. The BKA file itself is still not public info.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next