SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: TimF4/10/2008 4:41:39 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 90947
 
But We Didn't Mean For Those Laws to Apply to Us

Today's emails seem to be following the theme of government exempting itself from its own regulations.

In the first story, many California government employees (and their families!) are issued with license plates that effectively exempt them from traffic law violations.

In the second story, the town of Ann Arbor, Michigan sets out on a voyage of discovery in which they find out that minimum wages can drastically increase costs and that different people have different needs. And so, they exempt themselves from the law. I am particularly sensitive to this story because the reason the city claims it is unfair to apply the law to them exactly matches my business:

After several months of negotiation, Ann Arbor elected officials Monday agreed to waive the city's "living wage'' law for the Ann Arbor Summer Festival.

What's been at issue is the application of the wage law to the festival's temporary workers. Under the living-wage law, groups that have contracts of $10,000 or more with the city must pay above-minimum wages. That wage level is now around $12 an hour for employees who don't receive health benefits.

Because the increased wages would significantly add to the costs of putting on the festival

Wow, who would have thought that artificially setting wage rates above the market clearing price would increase costs? But to continue:

City Council Member Chris Easthope, who's promoted the change, argues that the festival's seasonal employees - almost all students - are not the kind of workers the wage law was meant to protect.

"This isn't an attempt to drop people below living wage levels, but to recognize there are some short-term events that struggle. I don't think that, when it was adopted, the living wage was meant to have that effect on a one-month event.''

Let's see. I hire temporary seasonal workers in Michigan for about three months of the year. And thought they are not students, most are retired people in their seventies who are also likely "not the kind of workers the wage law was meant to protect." In fact, many of my workers are disabled and work slower, so I probably have a better argument than the city. So where is my exemption?

coyoteblog.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext