cll.to - institutional holders now 8.51%, up from 7.24% as of 06 april [above post], and 29 holders where there were 28 ... no idea how often Reuters updates this page ... going to try pasting this in for future comparison -
'% Shares Owned: 8.51% # New Positions: 10
# of Holders: 29 # Closed Positions: 7
Total Shares Held: 17,895,277 # Increased Positions: 8
3 Mo. Net Change: 4,256,518 # Reduced Positions: 5
Price Range Quarter: 3.00 - 3.56 # Net Buyers: 3 '
stocks.us.reuters.com
On james - he's too hypey for my taste too, something breathless there that doesn't belong in adult company, and a certain amount of exaggeration for emphasis ... but i don't see him pumping garbage [happen to hold another for which he's taken flak, Lithic lth.v], and he's been around a long time, so i let it go, and just wish he'd pick up some studied british understatement or something
[edit] - hadn't seen kidl's post before typing the above ... for the record, i'm more of a Kastelian, lol ... but they're both good companies, both managements a bit odd, but not fundamentally flawed, just somewhat slow in one case and arguably over-diverse in the other ... value remains however, and is underpriced in both
What Connacher needs is for institutions to take loose shares from retail, imho, and it's happening, slowly ... this is not the hard part of the move here, seems pretty clear it's heading north of 4.00, problem will be breaking out of this range ... a year now since the second and last print of 4.43, that'll be a test - stockcharts.com |
