SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE
SPY 681.44+1.6%Nov 10 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: d[-_-]b who wrote (19342)4/15/2008 1:00:53 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) of 25737
 
Yes. Exactly.

So they support:

1) Scientific Research.

2) The ability of physicians to prescribe to their patients (for any condition, in their professional opinions, that they believe it may help.)

and, 3) development and validation of 'non-smoked' forms of administration (such as oral administration... or the 'vaporizers' which are commercially available now).

And, like any good scientists... they say that government policy (or changes to policy) should be fact-based. Based upon solid medical/scientific research, not politics.

(Which of course, I... and, I think any rational person, should agree with....)

And the government should QUIT blocking medical research, and allow the scientists and medical researchers to have at it --- and let the 'chips fall where they may' REGARDLESS of what Big Brother's bureaucracies want.

(And... the medical establishment does not 'oppose' as you previously averred.)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News