SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rambi who wrote (246502)4/19/2008 9:30:28 PM
From: MJ  Read Replies (2) of 793781
 
The government is making a moral judgement here on what a family is, is not or should be.

If you are going to not allow polygamy then we must also not allow unions and marriages between two members of the opposite sex plus allowing them to adopt children.

The only option is to define a marriage as strictly between one man and one woman.

The psychiatrist is saying that teanage women are too immature to marry. A lot of us would not be here if our ancestors had followed that line of thinking. Many women were married in their teens in the 1700's and 1800's---it was not unusual to have a dozen children and not unusual for a husband or wife to marry the wife's sister or husband's brother if either the original husband or wife died----often with the purpose of providing a new mother or father for the existing children.

There's also another matter in all of this--------the buildings and the land------will the government confiscate this? From the air pictures, remember this is Texas where land is not lush with foliage such as in the mountains, East Coast and other areas-----this property is desirable.

If they confiscate it then who gets the $-------will the children who have been taken from their home get $?

Every effort should be made to keep the children with their mothers and brothers and sisters.

Have the candidates touched this yet?

mj
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News