SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ManyMoose who wrote (246917)4/22/2008 5:26:08 PM
From: goldworldnet  Read Replies (2) of 793954
 
This guy is not a fan of Clarence Thomas, but when it comes to why I like him so much, this writer gets it exactly right.

3 features of Thomas’ jurisprudence

Justice Thomas’ extreme view of stare decisis has three features that distinguish him from the rest of the Court, all of which deserve attention. First, he is unflinchingly honest. If he thinks the old cases should be discarded, he says so. Second, he is thinking big and tackling the serious questions in constitutional law to which the Court has not given a fresh look in decades. Third and most fundamentally, he believes that precedent qua precedent concerning constitutional law has no value at all; he does not give stare decisis any weight. Justice Thomas’ view is, at bottom, a doctrine of constitutional stare indecisis.

firstamendmentcenter.org

* * *
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext