Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Garden Rose who wrote (262425)	4/23/2008 8:47:34 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (3) of 281500

OK it can be used for land strikes. Its still too short of range to hit Israel. Range 120 km en.wikipedia.org Range 120 km en.wikipedia.org Range: 180 km en.wikipedia.org SS-N-22 Range: 90.00 km Improved version with a range of 160km missilethreat.com They have less than 1/10th of the needed range. And the 301 and 802 are subsonic. The 802 is low flying and agile, and thus not the easiest target, but it isn't the mach 2+ weapons everyone was making a big issue of before. And even if they where supersonic, even harder to shoot down, and had the range to reach Israel, several dozen cruise missiles aren't going to destroy or defeat the state of Israel. As for the patrol boats (do Boghammers even qualify as "patrol boats?), they did back off from the US navy ships. But even if they had not, it wouldn't have amounted to "the US wimps out when the itty bitty Iranian boats challenge them in the Persian Gulf". "The Iranians kept on coming, closing to a distance of 200 meters - about two football fields. Supposedly, our Navy was ready to open fire but didn't shoot because the Iranians turned away at the moment the order was given." nypost.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next