SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: geode00 who wrote (262561)4/24/2008 4:26:44 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
No, China's dictatorship allows what it allows and the economy grows at 9%.

Allows what it allows? What the hell does that mean?

What it has been allowing was a much greater degree of economic freedom. If it takes that away the "grows at 9%" will be history.

If your propaganda is true, Afghanistan, with no federal government to speak of should be a roaring economic success.

Afganistan was controlled by totalitarians in the Taliban. Now its a war zone.

But even with the war

"The real value of non-drug GDP increased by 29% in 2002, 16% in 2003, and 8% in 2004...

...Economic growth in 2005 is estimated at 14%."

web.worldbank.org

"Afghanistan’s GDP has doubled in the past five years and now stands at a 13 percent growth rate, while inflation has remained relatively low."

usip.org

"Real GDP growth exceeded 7% in 2007."
cia.gov

Of course Afghanistan is poorer than China, but China is poorer than the US. You issue is economic growth rather than absolute income or wealth.

If you free a country up from totalitarian communism, or totalitarian fundamentalist Islam, its economy does better. Why this should be a surprise to you I don't know.

No, hiring private contractors OUTSIDE THE MILITARY CHAIN OF COMMAND is privatization of war.

Nonsense.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext