SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: LindyBill4/25/2008 1:25:11 PM
   of 793881
 
The Dems are holding out for a payoff to the Liability Lawyers.

Immunity? That's A Problem
By Jeffrey Breinholt

In response to Andrew Cochran's latest post "No FISA? No Problem," the reason why no one has come up with a concrete example of an intelligence investigation suffering due to Congress' unwillingness to enact FISA reform is simple: this information - who the U.S. is currently targeting its FISA methods on - is classified, and therefore not subject to public discussion. The bill is hung up for one reason: disagreements over whether it should include retroactive immunity for telecoms. If telecoms that cooperated with what appeared to be legal government requests become fearful of being sued, intelligence will surely be lost while the government engages in protracted discussions with company compliance officers on the legality of their requests. That is the unfortunate legacy of an overlawyered culture.

Moreoever, as I have written, telecoms were not held liable for the more serious abuses of the Nixon Administration, when American journalists and NSC staffers had their phones tapped without a warrant. This precedent makes one wonder about the legitimacy of the 40 or so cases currently pending against the telecoms. Who will pay their legal fees to fight these cases to the point of dismissal? The telecom customers, in the form of fees that are passed on to them, and the US intelligence community, who will find themselves dealing in an adversarial way with the FBI, perhaps even when presented with signed FISA orders. This is bad all around.

counterterrorismblog.org

snipurl.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News