Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: geode00 who wrote (262739)	4/25/2008 3:44:31 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) of 281500

No, we are in Iraq for oil profits along with defense and industrial profits and political profit for Republicans. xkcd.com dailyramblings.com I have more respect for people who are actually on the frontlines of this fiasco than you do. No you don't. people who do essentially the same job but who are paid much more and have better equipment Few contractors do anything that approaches the same job. The vast majority are not security contractors, and the security contractors, don't do the same exact job either. Guarding a state department official is different than assaulting a nest of islamofascists, or going or patrolling a town. No, I have a problem with the privatization of such an important public function. Again there has been no privatization. And as for the contracting, do you have a problem when government contractors build ships for the navy, or set up computer systems? Or should the government move that all in house as well. "And not all the security contractors are hired by the US government." That is a meaningless statement. Its a very meaningful point. If the Iraqi government, or some company (American or not) hires security guards, that is hardly a sign of the US contracting out the war.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next