GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (121562)	4/26/2008 3:54:42 PM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (1) of 173976

it didn't change. It didn't create a surplus or it would never need fixing. You cannot have a surplus in a closed system with unknown future obligations. All intake is to be used for future obligations. There is never a surplus, there is simply adequate funds for future distribution. Otherwise they would not need to increase the payroll tax yearly. I was paying the max every year for a very long time and with the match from the employer I was paying for one persons total benefit and a little more depending on when they retired. One on one doesn't work. Secondly, don't claim Iraq lol The fund was robbed and always available to the general treasury. From the beginning it was a mess, but they never charged people so much as they do now. You work and collect so you don't pay any now. You are just a shameful gravy train rider. There should be no access to such a fund. It should be closed. It is a poor system, even without the fact that the fund doesn't exist. It has for a very long time been a paper figure, an IOU.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next