SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Giordano Bruno who wrote (366807)4/27/2008 11:54:26 AM
From: ldo79  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
a bit of light reading for a Sunday.......gotta love this snip - "When a sun-glassed coke-head on a used car lot informs a customer (who may be a recent immigrant barely able to comprehend English), that the “good news” is that he has qualified for the special low rate of l6% on that lovely overpriced rust-bucket, we all know what that is about. But when you can no longer distinguish between that used car salesman and the heads of our largest banks; that is a sorry spectacle."

“Financial” Crisis?
Saturday, 26 April 2008
by Richard Hirschhorn

When the financial media report to us that there is a financial crisis they are not talking about the ongoing problems driving our economy down into recession. They are not talking about an out of control political system that cannot control spending, they are not talking about the flight of capital and manufacturing overseas, and they are not talking about the oil shock that has us reeling.

The “crisis” they are describing is that troika of problems known as the housing “bubble”, the mortgage “meltdown” and the credit “crisis”.

This is no financial problem, but a scam, a fraudulent enterprise gone bust. A scheme. A swindle.

The only reason we believe what is happening to that troika is economic in nature is because news organizations gave the assignment to the wrong desk. This is not a story of economic theory gone wrong or of too much or too little regulation. This is a story that might have been ignited on Page Six, picked up by the crime blotter, and finally assigned to the front page. This is the story of the largest scandal in American history and it should be the hottest item in every news cycle.

In a mature economy such as ours, the financial sectors represent an ever-increasing share of the remaining pie. Enterprise becomes secondary to the financial products that bankroll everything. We may not make a thing that’s on all those shelves in the big-box stores, but the plastic in your pocket is All-American. Deals that put a business together often make as much or more money than the business itself. Banks and trading houses get a piece of everything both here and over there. We might not be able to make TVs, tan leather, weave fabric, or cobble a pair of shoes, but we’re hell on wheels when it comes to derivatives.

It is this ever increasing desperate attempt to manufacture profits out of thin air that has brought our banking system to the brink of collapse. Our leading financial institutions have gone over the line, the result being what financial reporters call a “crisis”. This is not a question concerning economic orientation. These are questions of morality, criminality and national character.

The major-league bunko artists that have brought this nation to the brink of ruin took their lead from practices perfected down on the farm. In the minor leagues of high finance, certain sectors of our lending establishment have long feasted on the desperate and naïve elements of our society living from paycheck to paycheck. These seedy practices are widespread and readily apparent in the car- loan, check cashing, credit card, student loan, and paycheck loan operations that prey on these desperate folks. In these industries, the more you take advantage of your customers the better off you are. Too many of our fellow Americans earn their living everyday by selling bad deals to the rest of us. The worse the financial instrument is for the customer, the more money they make in profit and commission. These sordid practices were an inspiration to our banking elite. They were an enabler of things to come.

This malevolent consciousness provided the architecture within which the initial fraud that underpins this scandal occurred. In the past, predatory loans represented a hardship to the borrower, but lenders still predicated profit on the expectation of being paid back. Today’s mortgage brokers issued loans to homebuyers knowing full well the borrowers would default. Every professional credit review informed the lenders that they were handing out loans that would never be repaid, and that they would never see a profit on the capital they were “investing”. This is not the twenty bucks your buddy “borrows” from you at the pub on Friday night. We are talking about hundreds of billions of dollars, perhaps trillions. The loss of such sums would represent the greatest disaster in our financial history, yet this huge amount was exposed knowing full well that it was not properly secured. This exposure had to be covered up, and this cover-up can be described as “stage two” of the scheme.

The availability of bad mortgages distorted the market for homes by increasing demand. This distortion in demand artificially increased home prices, an increase that provided a smokescreen to the underlying unsound mortgages and a rosy story for the business desk to report. These market distortions cannot be understood by traditional financial analysis because they were predicated on unsound principles, and perpetuated outside the bounds of all normal lending models. Even if the press didn’t, the perps knew these mortgages were no good. The proof of this is how fast they repackaged them and got them off the books. After all, if they were good loans, why the bum’s rush to get rid of them?

This derivative process can be likened to the role that “fences” play in the criminal underground. Hot goods are not worth a dime unless they can be fenced, turned into cash. Banks, institutions run by our leading citizens, took these highly questionable mortgages off the hands of the mortgage lenders, keeping the fraudulent scheme alive. Like an art thief scribbling a moustache on the Mona Lisa, losing mortgages were turned into derivatives. Apparently, on Wall Street, you can make a silk purse out of a cow’s ear. In this way, they enabled the unscrupulous lending they depended on to continue evading the economic consequence of a shady practice. While this went on, the financial press did not see a thing, nor sound the alarm, but restricted their abbreviated commentary to the single word: “bubble”.

To make the swindle complete, one more “accessory after the fact” was required. They needed somebody to provide a French bath to keep the stink off. The firms that rate bonds and derivatives provided this final link in the crooked scheme. Ratings agencies are supposed to be the Sergeant at Arms for the bond markets, providing one last firewall, protecting investors from instruments of dubious quality. Despite the fact they were based on bad loans, this garbage paper was allowed to enter global markets with a “Triple A” rating. These austere gentlemen were acting in a manner akin to Al Capone slapping a Stolichnaya label on a bottle of bathtub gin. Once again, the business desk missed the story, only continuing to murmur softly, “bubble”.

In the last few months the entire fabric of this scheme has come unwoven. Reported losses have already amounted to several hundred billion dollars. Lending institutions have lost so much money; they don’t have sufficient funds to make the legitimate loans
that allow for business expansion. This they call a “credit” crisis.

When a sun-glassed coke-head on a used car lot informs a customer (who may be a recent immigrant barely able to comprehend English), that the “good news” is that he has qualified for the special low rate of l6% on that lovely overpriced rust-bucket, we all know what that is about. But when you can no longer distinguish between that used car salesman and the heads of our largest banks; that is a sorry spectacle.

How can we explain the financial media missing the biggest story of the century?

The community of business journalists and economic commentators, including great newspapers, several magazines and a fistful of cable networks, did manage to send up a warning balloon. They called the situation a “bubble.” That was their way of saying, “there is something going on here, but we can’t say what it is, can we Mr. Jones?”

At that point, we should have gone on alert. After all, it was less than a decade ago, that our economy last suffered the damages caused by a “bubble”. That scam was called the dotcom “bubble”, when any jackass that could post a pricelist online was hailed, by our friends at the business desk, as a captain of industry. Have we forgotten how the entire nation was gulled into spending billions on resetting the clocks on our computers? We all learned then, or should have, what a “bubble” was and the damage it could do. When the dotcom bubble burst, to begin the new millennium, billions were lost. But today’s bursting, perhaps because we seemed to have learned nothing from the last one, is much, much worse.

Business reporters are not trained to report on either crime or scandal. This may be a case of being too close to the forest to see the trees. It may be a case of needing a fox, not a chicken, in the henhouse. Maybe business journalists need to learn when an “outside” auditor is called for.

Sport has been assigned even more coverage than business. No newscast dares omit the scores. Some events have twenty camera setups. Not even Greenspan got twenty camera setups. Like finance, there are oodles of publications and broadcasts designed to shout out every detail of every game. Despite this, THE GAME was perverted by steroid use. Seasoned journalists on the sports beat now say how obvious the abuse was, how easy it was to pick out the abusers. Thanks a lot.

The Pope was in town. There were a lot of new and unfamiliar faces popping up on the screen. These are the religion reporters whose specialty is reporting on our various spiritual communities. Every one of them has noted how important, and inspiring, it is that the Holy Father met with those sexually abused by priests. Yet, that vile practice went on for decades and not a peep about it was heard from the God desk. For Christ’s sake, how did they miss that story? If we want to protect children from religious pedophiles, perhaps we should give the coverage to the atheist desk.

It is not likely we are going to see any of the villains in this piece do the perp walk. They probably have not broken any laws. The first premise to avoiding justice is knowing how to commit the perfect crime, and the perfect crime is the one that is legal.

Another way crooks can be assured they will get away with it is by knowing who is looking over your shoulder. If the sports desk can miss steroid abuse, and the God desk can describe child molesting as a religious problem, big time bank swindlers can rest easy knowing that even when they are caught, it will only be described as a financial crisis.

Maybe all the serious reporting should be given to the political desk. Maybe they would have done a better job than the guys from the business desk. Ought to run down there and ask. As soon as they get back, that is just what I’m going to do.

Right now, they’re all out buying lapel pins.

atlanticfreepress.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext