SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (28168)4/28/2008 2:05:30 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 71588
 
I wasn't aware that the 'F.D.A.' had *any* purview with regard to a BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT to the US Constitution.

And people say I'm to literal minded...

You have ZERO evidence for that claim that a CONSTITUTIONAL Amendment, which has never yet been enacted, 'isn't effective'.

You have zero direct evidence that it is.

I have indirect evidence that it isn't effective at controlling spending. States and other nations, with such constitutional prohibition of deficits, have still managed to greatly increase their spending.

"... and to strict of regime of it can also have negative side effects."

(Sure... such as reducing the budgets for your favorite federal bureaucracies or programs! LOL!)


No, that would be the desired effect (even if it probably wouldn't happen). The side effects I foresee would be either

1 - No flexibility in times of serious crisis to run temporary deficits when they might be useful

or

2 - If you allow such flexibility, than the politicians make any problem in to some serious crisis. Any level of conflict becomes war if you make an exception for wars. Every domestic problem becomes a national emergency if you make an exception for national emergencies.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext