American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (28192)	4/29/2008 12:37:20 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) of 71588

"Greatest number of experts claim", isn't much of an argument for me. I don't put much stock in arguments from authority. I might look to experts for claims of specific known fact, but this isn't an issue of specific known fact. As for the "what do we have to lose", well on a lot of structural changes, we may indeed have something to lose, but this one perhaps not so much. At worst I don't think it will be a major problem, so I wouldn't oppose the idea. But to actually support, rather than just not oppose, a constitutional amendment, I need more than "well it probably won't hurt".

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next